AR Tax Lien Dashboard

Arkansas Mineral Royalty Intelligence Report

Prepared: March 2026 Production Year: 2024

Data Sources: Commissioner of State Lands (cosl.org), Arkansas Oil & Gas Commission (AOGC), DFA Assessment Coordination Division, Arkansas GIS CAMP

View Interactive Dashboard →

1. Executive Summary

The Arkansas Commissioner of State Lands (COSL) holds 58,374 tax-delinquent mineral parcels across the state. Cross-referencing these against the AOGC production database reveals that 4,243 producing oil and gas wells operated during 2024 on the same PLSS sections as COSL mineral parcels, generating $78.0 million in royalty revenue at the standard 12.5% royalty rate.

Under AR Code 26-37-314(a)(3)(C), royalties attributable to tax-delinquent mineral interests "shall be paid to the Commissioner of State Lands and credited to the State Apportionment Fund."

The central question this report raises: How much of that royalty revenue corresponds to COSL-held mineral interests, and how much is actually being collected?

Important caveat: This report can establish which wells are near COSL mineral parcels and how much royalty revenue those wells generate. It cannot determine COSL's exact ownership fraction without access to division orders, which are FOIA-exempt under Act 538. All "COSL share" figures in this report are estimates based on parcel counts as a proxy for ownership fractions — the actual amounts could be significantly higher or lower.

2. What We Know

The following facts are derived directly from public data sources and do not depend on ownership fraction estimates:

Verified facts (no assumptions required):
  • COSL holds 58,374 tax-delinquent mineral parcels with $12.2M in delinquent taxes due
  • 4,243 producing wells operated in 2024 on the same PLSS sections as COSL mineral parcels
  • Those wells generated $78.0 million in royalty revenue (12.5% of gross production value)
  • 493 wells are definitively matched to COSL parcels by well name — the parcel's legal description IS the well identifier (e.g., "VAUGHN #1-23 H14")
  • Those 493 wells generated $8.24 million in total royalty revenue in 2024
  • 29 wells are verified by CAMP point-in-polygon — a mineral parcel polygon physically contains the well point ($1.65M/year in royalties)
  • 2 wells sit on CAMP mineral parcels owned by "State of AR" (~$110K/year in royalties)
  • 4,449 mineral parcels are owned by oil & gas operators themselves (XTO, SWN, Chesapeake, etc.) with $6.05M in delinquent taxes

3. What We Estimate

Key assumption: Where we cannot determine actual ownership fractions from division orders, we use the ratio of COSL mineral parcels to total mineral parcels in each section as a proxy. For example, if COSL holds 3 of 5 mineral parcels in a section, we estimate 60% COSL ownership. This is a rough proxy — individual parcels can represent wildly different fractional interests (from 0.001% to 25%+).
MetricFigureConfidenceBasis
Annual COSL share (well-name matches only)$2.68M/yearModerate493 wells matched by name; ownership fraction estimated from parcel counts
Annual COSL share (all confidence tiers)$4.53M/yearLow4,243 wells; includes UNKNOWN tier with minimal parcel data
Accumulated COSL share since delinquencyUp to $65.3MLow493 wells × actual production × estimated ownership fraction over avg 16.1 years
Total royalty on COSL sections (upper bound)$78.0M/yearN/A (ceiling)All royalty revenue on sections containing any COSL mineral parcel

The $2.68M/year figure for the 493 well-name-matched wells is the most defensible estimate because these parcels are definitively tied to specific wells. However, even this figure relies on parcel-count-based ownership fractions, not actual division order data.

4. What We Don't Know

Critical unknowns that affect every estimate in this report:
  1. Actual ownership fractions. Division orders specify the exact royalty interest for each owner. They are FOIA-exempt (Act 538). Without them, we use parcel counts as a proxy — which could over- or under-estimate COSL's share by an order of magnitude.
  2. Current collection status. We do not know whether COSL is currently receiving any royalty payments under § 26-37-314(a)(3)(C). If they are, the "uncollected" figure is overstated.
  3. Redemption status. Some parcels listed as delinquent may have been redeemed but not yet removed from the COSL database. We cannot verify this from public data.
  4. 83.5% of mineral parcels lack sub-section location data in their legal descriptions — we can only match them at the section level (640 acres), not to specific well locations.
  5. Depth and formation severances. Mineral interests can be split by depth (e.g., rights to formations above the Fayetteville Shale vs. below). We cannot determine this from legal descriptions.
  6. Parcel-to-interest mapping. Only 4.8% of parcels state an explicit ownership fraction (e.g., "UND 1/2 INT"). For the remaining 95.2%, we have no direct indication of what fractional interest the parcel represents.

5. COSL Parcel Inventory

CategoryCount% of TotalTotal Tax Due
Mineral parcels58,37454.1%$12.2M
Surface parcels49,60345.9%$32.4M
Total107,977100%$44.6M

Mineral Sub-Classification

Sub-TypeCountDescription
M-suffix unclassified39,039Parcel code ends in "M" (mineral indicator)
Producing mineral11,833Legal description references production
Mineral rights only2,906Explicitly severed mineral rights
Mineral unclassified2,734Mineral keywords in description
Royalty interest1,037Explicit royalty interest language
Oil and mineral480References oil production and minerals
Non-producing mineral260Explicitly non-producing
Mineral interest85Generic mineral interest

6. AOGC Production Analysis

The AOGC production database (738 MB Microsoft Access) contains 47,309 wells, 22,082 production reporting units, and 4,550,897 monthly production records (1983–2026). In 2024, 11,272 wells reported production.

StatusCountDescription
PA27,080Plugged & Abandoned
PR14,046Producing
A3,419Active
EX1,721Expired
Other1,043Various

7. Spatial Join: Wells × COSL Parcels

Wells and parcels are matched on PLSS Section-Township-Range. A well is considered "on" a COSL section if it shares the same PLSS section (640 acres). This is a necessary but not sufficient condition for COSL to have a royalty claim — the mineral interest must also cover the well's specific location within the section.

MetricValue
COSL parcels with STR coordinates103,828
Unique PLSS sections in COSL data9,277
Producing wells (2024) on COSL sections7,105
Producing wells on mineral parcel sections4,243

Production on Mineral Parcel Sections (2024)

CommodityVolumeMarket PriceGross ValueRoyalty (12.5%)
Oil1,314,425 BBL$66.64/BBL$87.6M$10.9M
Natural Gas (sold)251,186,951 MCF$3.62/MCF$909.3M$113.7M
Total$996.9M$124.6M

Of the $124.6M total, $78.0 million is attributable to wells on sections where COSL holds classified mineral parcels specifically.

8. County-Level Breakdown

Top 15 Counties by Royalty Revenue on COSL Sections

#CountyWellsOil (BBL)Gas Sold (MCF)Royalty Revenue
1Van Buren1,457073,798,802$33.4M
2Conway1,151064,993,106$29.4M
3Cleburne671038,166,243$17.3M
4Faulkner436023,761,213$10.8M
5Sebastian920013,627,704$6.2M
6White267012,898,218$5.8M
7Columbia248538,690993,478$4.9M
8Franklin59408,184,897$3.7M
9Logan28707,177,300$3.2M
10Ouachita189335,9250$2.8M
11Union151157,2780$1.3M
12Nevada67143,4310$1.2M
13Pope14702,006,519$0.9M
14Lafayette2491,070108,761$0.8M
15Crawford15501,624,098$0.7M

The top 4 counties (Van Buren, Conway, Cleburne, Faulkner) are all in the Fayetteville Shale gas play and account for $90.9M (73%) of total royalty revenue on COSL sections.

9. Highest-Value Wells on COSL Sections

Well NameOperatorCounty2024 RoyaltyCOSL Mineral Parcels in Section
Smackover (985) Unit #1ArklaTx Operating CoOuachita$552,10460
Wesson Hogg Sand Unit #1 WSSTS PetroleumOuachita$275,2073
Irma Nacatoch Unit #5601Nevada Oil, LLCNevada$192,0482
Grayson #5The Blackbird CompanyOuachita$159,65324
Pace #4Petro-Chem OperatingOuachita$149,69829
Wesson Smackover Unit #1Weiser-Brown OperatingOuachita$146,0009
Dennis 08-13 #7-20H17Flywheel EnergyFaulkner$104,842101
Dennis 08-13 #5-20H17Flywheel EnergyFaulkner$98,576101
Allison Trust 07-16 #4-15H11Flywheel EnergyConway$92,637246
Vaughan 09-17 #10-22H21Flywheel EnergyConway$86,32367

Key operators on COSL mineral sections: Flywheel Energy (Fayetteville Shale gas), Razorback Production (Conway), ArklaTx Operating (Smackover oil), STS Petroleum (Hogg Sand oil), Nevada Oil (Nacatoch oil).

10. Precision Well-to-Parcel Matching

10.1 Methodology

The section-level matching in Sections 7–9 is an upper bound. To determine whether wells actually sit on land where COSL holds mineral rights, we performed precision matching using:

  1. Well lat/lon coordinates from AOGC WellLocDetail (99.6% of matched wells have coordinates)
  2. PLSS section polygons from AR GIS Layer 10 (1,110 section boundaries)
  3. Quarter-section parsing of COSL legal descriptions (e.g., "NW1/4 NE1/4" = 40 acres)
  4. CAMP point-in-polygon queries for the top 500 wells by revenue

10.2 Legal Description Parsing

CategoryCount% of Mineral Parcels
Compound quarter calls (e.g., NW1/4 NE1/4)3,8506.6%
Standalone quarter calls (e.g., NW1/4)1,0261.8%
Well-name matches (division order parcels)4,7468.1%
No sub-section location data48,75283.5%
With explicit ownership fraction2,7954.8%
Key finding: 4,746 mineral parcels have well names as their legal description (e.g., "VAUGHN #1-23 H14", "DENNIS 08-13 #1-20H"). These represent individual royalty interest line items from division orders that were assessed as separate tax parcels. The legal description IS the well identifier, meaning the parcel is definitively tied to a specific producing well.

10.3 Match Confidence Results

ConfidenceWellsDescriptionRoyalty RevenueEst. COSL Share*
WELL-NAME493Parcel IS the well (division order match)$8.24M$2,683,900
HIGH202Well inside parcel's quarter-quarter section$3.85M$583,200
MEDIUM150Same quarter, different sub-quarter$3.30M$154,800
LOW400Same section, different quarter$7.92M$184,400
UNKNOWN2,998No location data on parcel$54.68M$927,900
Total4,243$78.0M$4,534,200

* COSL share estimated using parcel counts as a proxy for ownership fractions. Actual share requires division order data.

10.4 CAMP Point-in-Polygon Verification

MetricValue
Wells queried (top 500 by revenue)500
Wells with CAMP parcel at location496 (99.2%)
Wells with CAMP mineral parcel at exact location29
"State of AR" as mineral parcel owner2

Two wells in Cleburne County (Arklan, Inc. #5-32H5 and #8-32H29, ~$110,000/year in royalties) sit on a CAMP mineral parcel owned by "STATE OF AR" with $53,630 total assessed value.

11. Division Order Reconstruction

For the 493 wells matched by well name, we reconstructed partial division orders by grouping all COSL mineral parcels tied to each well. Each parcel represents one royalty owner's interest in that well.

Methodology caveat: We estimate COSL's ownership fraction by dividing the number of COSL mineral parcels in a section by the total number of mineral parcels. This is an imprecise proxy — one parcel might represent 0.001% interest while another represents 25%. The actual COSL share can only be determined from division orders.
MetricValue
Wells with reconstructed division orders493
Total COSL parcels tied to specific wells4,746
Estimated annual COSL royalty share$2.41M/year*

* Based on parcel-count proxy. Actual figure requires division order verification.

Top Wells by Estimated COSL Share

WellOperatorCounty2024 RoyaltyCOSL ParcelsEst. COSL Share*
Lankford 7-12 #1-17HRazorback ProductionFaulkner$58,2132/2 (100%)$58,213
Davis 09-08 #1-16H9Flywheel EnergyCleburne$46,3711/1 (100%)$46,371
Kessinger Trust #1-2HFlywheel EnergyFaulkner$76,9063/5 (60%)$46,144
McNinch #1-34H3Van Buren EnergyFaulkner$41,4971/1 (100%)$41,497
Aldridge #4-15HVan Buren EnergyCleburne$46,39439/45 (87%)$40,208
Cowan 8-12 #1-7HRazorback ProductionFaulkner$37,1394/4 (100%)$37,139
Hooten #4-17HVan Buren EnergyCleburne$36,82724/24 (100%)$36,827
Sandage Trust #1-21H28Razorback ProductionCleburne$35,8851/1 (100%)$35,885

12. Operator-Owned Delinquent Parcels

Cross-referencing COSL parcel owner names against AOGC WellMaster operator names revealed that 4,449 mineral parcels are owned by the oil and gas operators themselves — not individual landowners. These represent working interests, overriding royalty interests, or acquired mineral interests held by the companies that operate the wells.

OperatorDelq. ParcelsTax DueAR WellsActiveCounties
XTO Energy1,564$130,0204750Cleburne, Conway, Faulkner, Pope, Sebastian, Van Buren
SWN Production / Southwestern Energy1,016$5,753,100180Conway
Panhandle Oil & Gas631$88,25500Conway
Chesapeake484$28,1961610Cleburne, Conway, Faulkner, Pope, Sebastian, Van Buren
Philpott Oil & Gas242$10,13200Cleburne, Conway, Faulkner, Pope, Van Buren
Legacy Reserves170$5,90400Conway
Shakti Energy152$4,55500Conway
BHP Billiton93$21,109900Cleburne, Conway
SEECO72$12,0118611Cleburne, Conway, Pope, Van Buren
Merit Energy20$1,0081,5571,389Pope, Cleburne
Flywheel Energy4$1823,9683,716Cleburne, Pope
Total4,449$6,054,508

Notable: SWN Production owes $5.75M on 1,016 parcels in Conway County. XTO Energy (ExxonMobil subsidiary) holds 1,564 parcels across 6 counties. Merit Energy and Flywheel Energy operate thousands of active wells on COSL sections while simultaneously owning delinquent mineral parcels.

13. Accumulated Royalties

For the 493 well-name-matched wells, we computed accumulated royalties from each parcel's year of delinquency through 2024 using actual AOGC production data.

Important caveats on accumulated figures:
  • Production volumes are verified (from AOGC records), but prices are held constant at 2025 DFA rates ($66.64/BBL, $3.62/MCF). Historical prices varied significantly — particularly gas prices which ranged from ~$2–$13/MCF over this period. The actual accumulated revenue could be materially different.
  • The COSL share fraction is estimated using the same parcel-count proxy described above. Without division orders, we cannot verify what portion of each well's royalty belongs to COSL.
  • We do not know whether any of this revenue was actually collected by COSL during the delinquency period. If COSL has been receiving payments, the "uncollected" characterization is incorrect.
MetricValue
Wells analyzed493
Average years delinquent16.1 years
Total accumulated royalty revenue (verified production, constant prices)$180.7M
Estimated COSL accumulated share (parcel-count proxy)Up to $65.3M*

* Upper-bound estimate. Actual figure depends on division order ownership fractions and whether any revenue was already collected.

Top Wells by Estimated Accumulated COSL Share

WellOperatorCountyYearsTotal Accum.Est. COSL Share*
Davis 09-08 #1-16H9Flywheel EnergyCleburne14$1,273,383$1,273,383
Cowan 8-12 #1-7HRazorback ProductionFaulkner14$1,234,260$1,234,260
Elmer 8-13 #4-31HRazorback ProductionFaulkner15$1,431,783$1,193,153
Crain 8-13 #1-29HRazorback ProductionFaulkner15$1,086,362$1,086,362
Carr #1-30HVan Buren EnergyCleburne12$960,399$960,399
Lieblong 08-13 #2-13H1Flywheel EnergyFaulkner14$1,229,928$922,446
Smith, Ellis 08-13 #1-16HFlywheel EnergyFaulkner15$910,242$910,242
Smith, Betty 08-13 #1-17HFlywheel EnergyFaulkner15$1,099,092$903,698

AR Code 26-37-314: Tax-Delinquent Mineral Interests

(a)(3)(C) — All rents, royalties, delay rentals, and bonus payments attributable to a tax-delinquent mineral interest that has not been redeemed shall be paid to the Commissioner of State Lands and credited to the State Apportionment Fund.

(b) — The owner of the surface estate may purchase the tax-delinquent mineral interest from the Commissioner of State Lands.

AR Code 26-26-1110: Assessment of Mineral Rights

  • County assessor shall assess all producing mineral interests (subsection (a)(2))
  • Division orders must be submitted annually, electronically, by April 15 (subsection (d))
  • Penalty of 10% of property taxes due for late division orders
  • Division orders are exempt from FOIA (Act 538)

AR Code 26-26-1308(a)(2): Annual Reappraisal

Producing mineral interests shall be reappraised annually for ad valorem tax purposes (effective January 1, 2014).

15. DFA Assessment Methodology

The DFA publishes annual "Guidelines for Mass Appraisal of Mineral Real Property and Personal Property" prescribing how county assessors must value producing mineral interests. This is the legally mandated methodology under ACA 26-26-1308(a)(2).

Oil Assessment (2025 Parameters)

  • Market price: $66.64/BBL (Arkansas market average, per Act 668 of 2021)
  • Decline rate: 30%/year for new wells; 20% for stripper wells (<15 bbl/day)
  • Discount rate: 15.0%
  • Assessment rate: 20% of market value

Gas Assessment (2025 Parameters)

  • Market price: $3.62/MCF
  • Annual value per MCF: $3.62 × 365 = $1,321.30
  • Royalty assessed value: $1,321.30 × 0.125 × 0.20 = $33.03 per MCF of ADP

16. Assessor Data Cross-Reference (CAMP)

MetricValue
Statewide mineral assessor records (types RM + AM)35,327
Matched to COSL parcels by section/township/range28,850
Total assessed value of matched parcels$352.6M

17. Recommendations

  1. FOIA request to COSL for royalty collection data — determine how much is currently being collected under § 26-37-314(a)(3)(C)
  2. Division order audit — request a sample of division orders from top operators (Flywheel Energy, ArklaTx, STS Petroleum, Nevada Oil) to determine whether COSL is listed as a royalty interest holder and what fractional interests apply
  3. Operator notification campaign — if COSL is not listed on division orders, systematic notification to operators would be the mechanism to begin collection
  4. Surface owner sale analysis — evaluate the § 26-37-314(b) pathway using CAMP surface owner data to identify potential buyers
  5. Production-based parcel valuation — use AOGC production data and DFA tables to assign defensible market values to COSL mineral parcels

18. Follow-Up Questions

Questions for COSL

  1. Is COSL currently receiving any royalty payments under 26-37-314(a)(3)(C)? If so, how much annually and from which operators?
  2. Does COSL have a process for notifying operators that mineral interests have been forfeited to the state?
  3. Has COSL pursued surface-owner sales under 26-37-314(b)? If so, at what price points and how many mineral parcels have been sold?
  4. What is COSL's current process for tracking which mineral parcels are on producing acreage?
  5. Are any of the parcels listed as delinquent actually redeemed but not yet removed from the database?

Questions for County Assessors

  1. Are the M-suffix parcels in COSL data the same records that appear in county assessor rolls, or are they separate?
  2. For well-name parcels (division order line items), are these assessed annually based on current production per ACA 26-26-1308(a)(2)?
  3. What ownership fractions appear on the division orders for these wells? (Understanding that division orders are FOIA-exempt, but assessors receive them under § 26-26-1110(d))
  4. How are operator-owned mineral interests (XTO, SWN, Chesapeake parcels) assessed differently from individual royalty interests?

Questions Requiring Data We Don't Have

  1. What are the actual ownership fractions on division orders for the 493 well-name-matched wells? Division orders are FOIA-exempt under Act 538, but COSL may be able to request them as the mineral interest holder.
  2. For the operator-owned parcels (XTO, SWN, Chesapeake), are these working interests, ORRIs, or acquired royalties? The tax treatment and royalty entitlement differs for each.
  3. Do depth or formation severances exist on any of these mineral interests? A parcel might only cover formations above or below the producing zone.
  4. Have any of these operators already been paying royalties to COSL but the payments are not reflected in public records?

Analytical Questions We Could Answer With More Work

  1. Can we pull historical oil/gas prices per year (instead of using constant 2025 prices) to get more accurate accumulated royalty figures?
  2. Can we match more of the 2,998 UNKNOWN wells using CAMP centroid geolocation (querying parcel centroids by county + section)?
  3. Can we cross-reference COSL parcel redemption records to exclude parcels that have been redeemed?
  4. Can we obtain historical COSL royalty collection reports to determine baseline collection levels?
  5. For wells where COSL holds 100% of parcels in the section, can we verify through county clerk deed records whether any mineral conveyances were missed?

Appendix: Data Sources & Methodology

A.1 COSL Parcel Data

  • Source: cosl.org public database
  • Downloaded: March 2026
  • Records: 107,977 parcels with parcel number, legal description, owner, tax due, county, year of delinquency

A.2 AOGC Production Database

  • Source: AOGC.mdb (downloaded from AOGC website)
  • Database size: 738 MB (Microsoft Access format)
  • Production data: Monthly reports through early 2026
  • Analysis year: 2024 (most recent full calendar year)

A.3 AR GIS CAMP

  • Source: ArcGIS FeatureServer (Planning_Cadastre service)
  • Layer 0: Parcel centroids; Layer 6: Parcel polygons
  • Key fields: parcelid, ownername, parceltype, assessvalue, totalvalue, section, township, range
  • Mineral types: RM (Real Mineral) and AM (Assessed Mineral)

A.4 DFA Assessment Guidelines

  • Source: DFA 2025 Guidelines for Mass Appraisal of Mineral Real Property and Personal Property
  • Supplemented by: RTC "Recommendations for Improvement of Arkansas' Oil and Gas Assessed Valuations" (June 2018)

A.5 Spatial Matching

  • Parcels and wells matched on PLSS Section-Township-Range
  • COSL STR parsed from legal descriptions (format: "Section: X Township: YS Range: ZW")
  • AOGC STR from WellMaster table (Section, Township, TownshipDir, Range, RangeDir)
  • CAMP STR normalized from parcel records

A.6 Royalty Revenue Calculation

  • Royalty revenue = Production volume × Market price × 12.5% royalty rate
  • Oil price: $66.64/BBL (DFA 2025 Arkansas market)
  • Gas price: $3.62/MCF (DFA 2025)
  • ADP = Total annual production ÷ (months reporting × 30 days)

This report was generated from publicly available data sources. All production figures come from official AOGC records. Assessment methodology follows published DFA guidelines. Legal citations reference current Arkansas Code Annotated.
View Interactive Dashboard